The e-money revolution

China’s success in electronic payment wallets is encouraging other countries to move towards a cashless society. High smartphone penetration rates act as enablers for countries like Malaysia to follow in China’s footsteps.

Tan Ming Han
Chief Investment Officer, Eastspring Al-Wara’ Malaysia

15 Aug 2019 | 5 min read

Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), the Malaysian central bank, issued 10 new electronic money (e-money) licences to non-banks in 2018, bringing the total to 47 issuers for a population of approximately 32 million. Strong support from the regulator and the abundance of capital being invested in the mobile payment space by the likes of Alibaba and Tencent attest to the growing popularity of digital money.

Fig 1: Smartphone statistics1

Fig-1-e-money

Fig 2: BNM’s payment systems’ reform measures2

Fig-2-e-money

Although Malaysia’s mobile payment landscape continues to be dominated by banks – which accounted for 98.4 percent and 99.4 percent of the mobile payment transaction volume and value respectively in 2017 (primarily through online banking applications) – e-money mobile payment services offered by non-banks are beginning to gain traction.

The number of subscribers to mobile payment services offered by non-banks had more than quadrupled to 3.4 million subscribers as at end-June 2018 from 0.8 million subscribers in 2017. In the first half of 2018 alone, mobile payment transactions processed by non-bank e-money issuers stood at 7.2 million transactions (valued at MYR404.7 million), which is more than seven times higher than the 1.0 million transactions in 2017 (valued at MYR240.3 million)3.

Thanks for subscribing!

Follow us :

Attractive business model

Just as how Uber and Grab disrupted the ride hailing industry, it would be imprudent to not consider the threat of e-money issuers to incumbent players such as banks. For a start, unlike banks which charge fees from payments, e-money players do not charge transaction or payment service fees. Most Malaysian banks in this regard have lowered payment charges in recent years, such as the intrabank fund transfer and interbank GIRO rates to mitigate this threat.

E-money operators also offer a myriad of other services in its platform. For instance, Grab Pay was launched following the success of Grab’s e-hailing service which secured a captive user base within its ecosystem. Using Grab Pay, users were introduced to various other services, such as fund transfer and paying for other Grab services which include bills, food delivery and rides. Most e-money operators in Malaysia today are competing for user acquisitions by offering multiple incentives such as shopping cash backs or discounted services (transportation, bill payment, e-Commerce) using their respective electronic wallets.

In addition, e-money has no “shelf life”, unlike bank-issued credit cards. Shoppers these days prefer hassle-free mobile payments via e-wallet for online and offline retail purchases which offer rewards with cashback for buying from a variety of great deals, discounted products, vouchers and services.

Forecasts suggest mobile commerce will account for 70 percent of digital commerce sales globally by 20224. Digital payments will double in volume over the next five years to represent approximately 29 percent of consumer Point of Sale (POS) payments, with in-app payments exceeding browser-based e-commerce by 2021 (with POS “tap and pay” a distant third)5. This suggests that the use of bank-issued credit cards will likely reduce following the rise of digital payments.

Barriers to faster adoption

Despite the rising popularity of e-money, there are a number of challenges. First and foremost is the purse size for e-money operators. In Malaysia, there are only 2 schemes e-money operators can offer i.e. the maximum purse size of MYR1,500 and a small scheme which limits the purse size to MYR200. In contrast, banks offer much higher limits on the credit cards. E-money users therefore cannot make large transactions on the platform.

In addition, e-money operators need to attract e-wallet users by expanding the reach via compatibility with different devices whilst providing improved security and greater merchant penetration. With plenty of options to choose from, many e-money operators have offered incentives such as cash back and rebates to draw users to the platform. This strategy over the long run will see e-money operators burning cash to sustain the e-wallet business6, which will possibly trigger an industry consolidation.

Interestingly, traditional bank platforms continue to dominate the payment landscape in Malaysia. A 2018 customer survey conducted by PwC Malaysia showed that only 22 percent of the respondents have used an e-wallet before. The survey also found that the top 3 reasons for adoption were promotions, convenience and digital receipts while concerns mainly revolved around low merchant adoption, security risks and poor user interface.

The value proposition

With improvements to mobile technology, e-money operators can add value to these areas:

  • a) Utilise customer data to offer personalised product and services such as automatic bill payments, goods ordering, delivery services and various services customisation. In addition, they can also incorporate loyalty rewards and help customers track their spending patterns;
  • b) Offer a one-stop digital ecosystem platform which provides financial services, insurance, healthcare or travel services, and
  • c) Create new jobs and enable the monetization of payments services at reduced cost compared to the traditional banks.

Nonetheless, the rise of non-bank e-money operators does not spell gloom and doom for banks. Many banks have responded with their own e-money offerings. For instance, Malaysia’s largest bank by asset size, Maybank Berhad, launched its own e-money wallet MAE while also offering its mobile payment solution Maybank QR Pay for its customers. Another major bank, CIMB Bank is vying its spot in the e-money space via its subsidiary Touch ‘n Go’s joint venture with Alibaba Group’s Ant Financial to tap the market, which currently dominates as the sole electronic payment system for expressways and highways in Malaysia.

E-money could help also banks with cost savings. We see the potential for banks to lower distribution costs, such as branches, ATM networks and Point of sale terminals as consumers familiarise themselves with e-money payments and demand less physical touch points for banking and payment services.

In short, e-money is one form of digitalization and like its many other forms, existing businesses will need to adapt, or risk being left behind. In fact, there are growth opportunities for those who embrace such digital disruptions. The winners be it non-bank or bank operators will likely be ones that provide the best user experience, command trust and offer the best benefits.

For Use with Professional Clients / Qualified Investors Only. Not Approved for Further Distribution or Use with the General Public.

The information and views expressed herein do not constitute an offer or solicitation to deal in shares of any securities or financial instruments and it is not intended for distribution or use by anyone or entity located in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be unlawful or prohibited. The information does not constitute investment advice or an offer to provide investment advisory or investment management service or the solicitation of an offer to provide investment advisory or investment management services in any jurisdiction in which an offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of that jurisdiction.


Past performance and the predictions, projections, or forecasts on the economy, securities markets or the economic trends of the markets are not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of Eastspring Investments or any of the strategies managed by Eastspring Investments. An investment is subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. Where an investment is denominated in another currency, exchange rates may have an adverse effect on the value price or income of that investment. Furthermore, exposure to a single country market, specific portfolio composition or management techniques may potentially increase volatility.


Any securities mentioned are included for illustration purposes only. It should not be considered a recommendation to purchase or sell such securities. There is no assurance that any security discussed herein will remain in the portfolio at the time you receive this document or that security sold has not been repurchased.


The information provided herein is believed to be reliable at time of publication and based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation of this report and not as of any future date. Eastspring Investments undertakes no (and disclaims any) obligation to update, modify or amend this document or to otherwise notify you in the event that any matter stated in the materials, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth in the document, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate. Eastspring Investments personnel may develop views and opinions that are not stated in the materials or that are contrary to the views and opinions stated in the materials at any time and from time to time as the result of a negative factor that comes to its attention in respect to an investment or for any other reason or for no reason. Eastspring Investments shall not and shall have no duty to notify you of any such views and opinions. This document is solely for information and does not have any regard to the specific investment objectives, financial or tax situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this document.


Eastspring Investments Inc. (Eastspring US) primary activity is to provide certain marketing, sales servicing, and client support in the US on behalf of Eastspring Investment (Singapore) Limited (“Eastspring Singapore”). Eastspring Singapore is an affiliated investment management entity that is domiciled and registered under, among other regulatory bodies, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Eastspring Singapore and Eastspring US are both registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission as a registered investment adviser. Registration as an adviser does not imply a level of skill or training. Eastspring US seeks to identify and introduce to Eastspring Singapore potential institutional client prospects. Such prospects, once introduced, would contract directly with Eastspring Singapore for any investment management or advisory services. Additional information about Eastspring Singapore and Eastspring US is also is available on the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec. gov.


Certain information contained herein constitutes "forward-looking statements", which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "anticipate", "project", "estimate", "intend", "continue" or "believe" or the negatives thereof, other variations thereof or comparable terminology. Such information is based on expectations, estimates and projections (and assumptions underlying such information) and cannot be relied upon as a guarantee of future performance. Due to various risks and uncertainties, actual events or results, or the actual performance of any fund may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements.


Eastspring Investments companies (excluding JV companies) are ultimately wholly-owned / indirect subsidiaries / associate of Prudential plc of the United Kingdom. Eastspring Investments companies (including JV’s) and Prudential plc are not affiliated in any manner with Prudential Financial, Inc., a company whose principal place of business is in the United States of America.