Growth drivers for new Asia
Digitalisation
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the pace of digital adoption in Asia. This is spurred by the region’s high smart phone penetration rates, mobile-savvy youthful populations, heavy investments in digital infrastructure and supportive regulatory frameworks.
Cisco’s Global Digital Readiness Index assesses countries’ digital readiness using a holistic approach that considers amongst other factors, the start-up environment, human capital, technology infrastructure as well as government and business investments. While Singapore is leading in terms of overall digital readiness, Fig. 3. reflects Asia’s heterogeneity in terms of digital readiness.
Digitalisation has increased financial inclusiveness and lifted operational efficiency for Asian companies. ASEAN signed a regional e-commerce agreement in 2019 which establishes common principles and rules for e-commerce growth, potentially heralding a digital common market. It is forecast that the digital economy in Southeast Asia will more than double from some USD170 billion in 2021 to USD360 billion by 2025, and then grow rapidly to about USD1 trillion by 20305. Digital readiness has become a source of competitive advantage for Asian consumer companies. It is estimated that 60 million people in Southeast Asia became online consumers during the pandemic6.
Given the different degrees of digital readiness across Asia, governments need to reduce the risk of a digital divide by ensuring that the lower income groups also get access to the internet and smart devices. This will enable Asia’s digital economy to grow in an inclusive and equitable manner.
Supply chain realignment
Geopolitical tensions and the COVID-19 pandemic are re-shaping global supply chains, causing multinational companies (MNCs) to seek more resilient supply chain networks. Besides reshoring, many MNCs are also looking to diversify their manufacturing facilities, away from China. China’s share of US imports has fallen by 7% since the start of the Sino-US trade conflict with Vietnam the main beneficiary of the sourcing shift. Vietnam’s share of US container imports rose by 6% during this period while the share accounted by the rest of ASEAN increased by 2%7. Apple has also shifted significant consumer electronics production from China to India with new manufacturing capabilities in Tamil Nadu.
Having a manufacturing base in Asia allows MNCs to access the region’s large and growing consumer base. Labour costs in developing economies such as Vietnam, Thailand and India are also cheaper compared to the developed economies. Meanwhile, Asian governments have sought to create a comprehensive manufacturing eco-system by establishing industrial parks and dedicated manufacturing zones. Asia8 is home to 301 seaports and 612 airports which helps to facilitate a seamless flow of trade for manufacturers9, the recent disruptions caused by the COVID-19 lockdowns notwithstanding. Distinct competitive advantages have resulted in different manufacturing specialisations across the region. Fig. 4. Telsa has picked Bangaluru as the location for its first plant in India while Samsung Electronics will start manufacturing semiconductor chips in Vietnam in 2023. India’s expanding manufacturing expertise is also one of the reasons why the market is drawing renewed interest from investors.
The region’s success in positioning itself as an attractive manufacturing-oriented center10 is seen from its ability to attract manufacturing Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). In 2021, FDI inflows for the region reached USD550 billion, accounting for 35% of global inflows, higher than for the US and Europe. Fig. 5. Going forward, international policies that require effective supply chain risk management systems and processes as well as supply chain due diligence and transparency will have implications for Asia. Asian corporates will need to improve on their due diligence processes in order to maintain their competitiveness as a leading global supply chain hub.
Technological innovation
Innovation plays an important role in driving Asia’s long-term growth. According to the Asian Development Bank, countries that manage to escape the middle-income trap11 invest 3 times more in research and development and apply for 4 times as many patents12. Encouragingly, tech-related capital spending and R&D expenditure have been rising in Asia. Fig. 6.
Asia’s relatively youthful and technologically savvy population as well as its strong work ethic have helped to drive innovation in the region. The 2021 Bloomberg Innovation Index—which ranks the world’s most innovative 95 countries based on R&D spending, manufacturing capability, and concentration of high-tech public companies—ranks South Korea at 1, Singapore at 2, Japan at 12, and China at 16. Europe takes up 7 out of the top 10 spots in the index, while the US exited the top 10 and is ranked 11. South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore and China can be considered as frontier innovators, creating unique products and services for the world. Asia’s cutting-edge technology in Taiwan and Korea for example has established high barriers to entry and entrenched the countries’ leadership positions in semiconductor manufacturing and design. This dominance cannot be easily chipped away as it comes from decades of government support, intentional policy design, knowledge development and private sector entrepreneurship. Meanwhile, the other markets in Asia can be considered as catch-up innovators, tweaking existing products and services for first time use in their home market.
While Asia is already innovating, quality education, financial support for R&D, property rights and conducive policies are key to helping the region innovate more.
Regional partnerships
Against the ongoing tide of protectionism and anti-globalisation sentiment, greater regional integration and mega trade agreements will be important to sustain the region’s growth momentum.
The Intraregional Trade Intensity Index (TII) measures the ratio of intra-regional trade as a share of world trade. A higher TII number implies that the region’s trade is oriented more towards its member countries than towards the rest of the world. While supply chains in Asia have helped meet demand in other regions, companies are also setting up supply chains in the region to service Asian markets13. Asia’s progress, affluence and diversity have created a dynamic ecosystem of buyers and sellers, allowing it to increasingly cater to its own final demand. Although ASEAN’s TII fell in 2019 (partly as a result of the COVID-19 lockdowns), it is higher than for the EU and North America. Fig. 7. Intra-regional trade within Asia and ASEAN is expected to rise as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) incentivises the rebuilding of supply chains in the region.
The RCEP came into effect in January 2022 and is a free trade agreement (FTA) between the 10 ASEAN economies and its FTA partners. RCEP accounts for 31% of global GDP, 29.7% of the world’s population and 29% of global trade. The diversity among RCEP members offers scope for complementary investments within the region. It is estimated that by 2030, RCEP will increase members’ income by 0.6%, regional income by USD245 billion and regional employment by 2.8 million jobs14.
There is also high regional cooperation and integration across Asia beyond trade. The Asian Development Bank’s Asia-Pacific Regional Cooperation and Integration Index tracks integration and cooperation across eight dimensions. Asia and the Pacific exceeded the other regions in technology and digital connectivity and performed equally as the EU in investment and value chain participation . On the other hand, there is room for greater environmental cooperation - Asia’s efforts are close to three-quarters of those in the EU and North America, the top performing regions.
Sustainability
Climate change is expected to have a significant impact on Asia with the potential to degrade productivity, agricultural yields, supply chains and infrastructure. That said, according to McKinsey & Company, “Asia is well positioned to address these challenges and capture the opportunities that come from managing climate risk effectively”16. Asian governments are increasingly incorporating sustainability in their economic agendas.
For example, under the ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC), the region aims for renewable energy to account for 23% of total primary energy supply and 35% of installed power capacity by 2025. Meanwhile, India has a goal to produce a cumulative 5m tonnes of hydrogen by 2030 as well as to bring down the cost of green hydrogen to USD2.50/kg by 2025 and to USD1/kg by 2030.
The number of ESG policies has risen sharply in Asia over the last five years although the ESG disclosure rate differs across the region. Fig. 8 and 9. Research shows that Asian companies that are highly aligned to the EU ESG Taxonomy have been able to trade at a premium (~55% on P/E and 64% on EV/EBITDA terms) relative to their sector peer groups17. As more Asian companies align themselves to the EU ESG Taxonomy, or as more APAC taxonomies leverage on the EU taxonomy, there is potential for increased ownership by ESG funds and hence higher valuations.
There will be opportunities for investors as companies try to align themselves to their governments’ net zero targets. China was the world’s largest producer of EV batteries in 2021, accounting for 79% of global manufacturing capacity18. China also manufactures 60% of all the world’s electric cars19 and has a near monopoly in solar panel manufacturing. Meanwhile, as South Korea accelerates towards a hydrogen-based economy, local companies that supply hydrogen fuel cells, manufacture hydrogen mobility vehicles, and distribute liquefied hydrogen will benefit from this transition.